The Economist - Bewerkingsoverzicht

G. de Vader op 8 jul 2017 om 13:04

2017-07-08T13:04:50Z

Monade op 21 feb 2013 om 14:31

2013-02-21T14:31:58Z

Monade op 14 mrt 2011 om 16:51

2011-03-14T16:51:39Z

Monade op 7 mrt 2011 om 23:36

2011-03-07T23:36:28Z

Monade op 1 jan 2011 om 21:28

2011-01-01T21:28:50Z

Monade op 1 jan 2011 om 21:25

2011-01-01T21:25:13Z

G. de Vader op 14 okt 2010 om 17:12

2010-10-14T17:12:35Z

Gronk op 9 okt 2010 om 19:02

2010-10-09T19:02:24Z

Trollbuster op 8 okt 2010 om 15:24

2010-10-08T15:24:22Z

Trollbuster op 8 okt 2010 om 15:23

2010-10-08T15:23:38Z

← Oudere versie		Versie van 8 jul 2017 om 13:04
Regel 1:		Regel 1:
−	[[Links]]e [[Engels]]talige, door de [[PvdA]] geïnfecteerde [[krant]]. Noemt onze [[Geert]] een valse profeet en een [[racist]]. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)[[nazi]] [[demoniseren\|vergeleken]]. Walgelijk!	+	[[Links]]e [[Engels]]talige, door de [[PvdA]] geïnfecteerde [[krant]]je dat niemand leest. Noemt onze [[Geert]] een valse profeet en een [[racist]]. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)[[nazi]] [[demoniseren\|vergeleken]]. Walgelijk!

@@ Regel 15: / Regel 15: @@
 I SYMPATHISE WITH WILDERS>''<br />
 '''DAULATRAM wrote: Oct 8th 2010 11:49 GMT'''
 ''More and more Dutch are fed up with the looney left and its political-correct censorist police. It was for years the leftist ideology, just as in the UK, to flood the country with illiterate immigrants from mainly muslim country's, after al it's the left's new electorate. Changing our city's beyond belief. Intolerance against gay's and non-muslim women is endemic in Holland now. Are hate mongering imams prosecuted by the 'anti-racism' industry? No! Their critics are! The world upside down. The left plundered the working taxpayer and subsidised the lazy and inactive, for decades. Enough is enough. Holland now shows Europe the new way, a bright new future without looney lefties and islamophiles!''<br />

@@ Regel 1: / Regel 1: @@
-[[Links]]e Engelstalige, door de [[PvdA]] ge&iuml;nfecteerde [[krant]]. Noemt onze [[Geert]] een valse profeet en een [[racist]]. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)[[nazi]] [[demoniseren|vergeleken]]. Walgelijk!
+[[Links]]e [[Engels]]talige, door de [[PvdA]] ge&iuml;nfecteerde [[krant]]. Noemt onze [[Geert]] een valse profeet en een [[racist]]. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)[[nazi]] [[demoniseren|vergeleken]]. Walgelijk!
-[[Categorie:kranten]]
+[[categorie:kranten]]
-[[Categorie:linkse kranten]]
+[[categorie:linkse kranten]]
 ----
 ''So The Economist thinks attacking Islam and The Koran is dangerous stupidity?''<br />
@@ Regel 22: / Regel 18: @@
 ''This side is top!''<br />
 '''John en Willeke wrote: Oct 8th 2010 1:30 GMT'''
 ''Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.''<br />
 '''JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT '''

← Oudere versie		Versie van 7 mrt 2011 om 23:36
Regel 1:		Regel 1:
−	[[Links]]e Engelstalige, door de [[PvdA]] ~~geinfecteerde~~ [[krant]]. Noemt onze [[Geert]] een valse profeet en een racist. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)[[nazi]] vergeleken.	+	[[Links]]e Engelstalige, door de [[PvdA]] geïnfecteerde [[krant]]. Noemt onze [[Geert]] een valse profeet en een [[racist]]. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)[[nazi]] [[demoniseren\|vergeleken]]. Walgelijk!

@@ Regel 9: / Regel 9: @@
-The Economist pearls;
+''"Maybe the state should not be in the business of prosecuting politicians for their offensive views."''<br />
+''Maybe? Has the Economist sunk so low that it isn't even sure about whether prosecuting people for their political views is appropriate? China, North-Korea and Iran - all of which prosecute people for their "offensive" views - are ecstatic. Freedom of speech for the Economist, but not for Wilders, apparently. Disgusting.''<br />
 ''"Maybe the state should not be in the business of prosecuting politicians for their offensive views."
-−
 Maybe? Has the Economist sunk so low that it isn't even sure about whether prosecuting people for their political views is appropriate? China, North-Korea and Iran - all of which prosecute people for their "offensive" views - are ecstatic. Freedom of speech for the Economist, but not for Wilders, apparently. Disgusting.'' <br />
 '''GeertAkbar wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:17 GMT'''
-''So The Economist thinks attacking Islam and The Koran is dangerous stupidity?
+''So The Economist thinks attacking Islam and The Koran is dangerous stupidity?''<br />
+''Utter rubbish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!''<br />
-Utter rubbish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+''IT IS BALDLY NEEDED. Thank God someone has had the guts to do it at last.''<br />
+''Marx said that the criticism of religion is the basis of ALL criticism. There can be no freedom without it. The Economist dishonestly says American conservatives sympathise with Wilders. Only? I AM AN INDIAN LEFTIST, and
-IT IS BALDLY NEEDED. Thank God someone has had the guts to do it at last.
+I SYMPATHISE WITH WILDERS>''<br />
-−
 Marx said that the criticism of religion is the basis of ALL criticism. There can be no freedom without it.
-−
 The Economist dishonestly says American conservatives sympathise with Wilders. Only? I AM AN INDIAN LEFTIST, and I SYMPATHISE WITH WILDERS>'' <br />
 '''DAULATRAM wrote: Oct 8th 2010 11:49 GMT'''
-''This side is top!'' <br />
+''This side is top!''<br />
 '''John en Willeke wrote: Oct 8th 2010 1:30 GMT'''
-''Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.'' <br />
+''Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.''<br />
 '''JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT '''

← Oudere versie		Versie van 8 okt 2010 om 15:24
Regel 27:		Regel 27:


−	[[Categorie:Linkse ~~krant~~]]	+	[[Categorie:Linkse kranten]]

← Oudere versie		Versie van 8 okt 2010 om 15:23
Regel 25:		Regel 25:
	''Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.'' <br />		''Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.'' <br />
	'''JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT '''		'''JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT '''
		+
		+
		+	[[Categorie:Linkse krant]]